Bruce A. McMenomy, Ph.D. and Christe A. McMenomy, Ph.D. for Scholars Online
2019-20: Mondays and Wednesdays, 6:00 - 7:30 p.m. Eastern Time
6: Mon, Sep 23, 2019
Please read the chapter and take the quiz by midnight on Sun, Sep 22, 2019.
Please also post in the forum for the day a short essay in response to this question:
Certainly the most contested and troubled resource in the period under discussion is population — the people themselves. In some regions enormous numbers of people were taken as slaves and kept locally; in others they were sold to slave traders from other continents for export like any other commodity. What this did to those taken is one important aspect of the phenomenon; what it did to the continent left behind is another. What it did to the places where the slaves arrived is yet a third.
As an issue of human values, we can surely agree that the practice was (and is) morally indefensible. Nevertheless, as historians, we have to look at things from a variety of different aspects. What were some of the economic and social consequences of this large-scale enforced exodus from Africa, and of the influx of an unpaid workforce in the other areas? Is reliance on slave labor economically sustainable ? What are some of its unexpected consequences? What are its long-term social ramifications? You may want to compare, among other things, the instances of slave cultures you have seen in other units previously — especially the Greco-Roman world.
Contents of this page © Copyright 2015-19 by Christe A. McMenomy and Bruce A. McMenomy.
Permission to download or print this page is hereby given to members of Scholars Online for purposes of personal study only. All other use constitutes a violation of copyright.